Step 1: Check us out

You don't have to be a member to look at any content on the site. Increase your expertise with our helpful tutorials, videos, forums, and sample PDFs.

Step 2: Sign up for a free account

Like what you see? Take the next step and become a member. Register now to get discounts, attend eSeminars, ask questions and more.

Step 3: Start participating

Get the most out of your membership. Post in the forums, create your profile, submit to the gallery, attend a user group meeting.
Log In now.

Kurt Foss's Blog

Kurt Foss's picture
Syndicate content
Posted: 2010-01-06

Playing the PDF name game: Common-sense filenames, please!

I ran across a recent PDF-related blog post that was part pet peeve, part New Year's resolution -- one I share with the author. David Appell wrote:

"If I could have only one thing for the new year, it would be that journals start to name their PDFs with useable filenames."

In his case, the frustration results from a practice at some of the science-oriented journals, from publications like Science and Nature, he regularly downloads in PDFs, reads and saves for future reference. His specific annoyance has to do with the meaningless filenames -- to the end user, at least -- too often given to such documents. As he explains:

"They are almost always named something like '709.pdf,' where 709 is the page number. But that's all--no reference to the journal name, author name, subject, issue, month or year."

"Because two minutes after 709.pdf gets to my hard drive I have no idea what paper it refers to. Sure, I can change the filename, but why should 10,000 of us have to change the filename when Science can do it just once and make it meaningful to both them and to us?"

I know the feeling. My particular experience along the same lines has to do with my favorite sport of tennis (both playing and watching). I play in various recreational leagues throughout the year sponsored by the local branch of the United States Tennis Association (USTA), which also provides on its website a wide range of useful tennis information--much of it as PDF files.

Documents include the official rules of tennis, newsletters for coaches, training guides, guide to tennis on college campuses, assorted practice drills and games, umpire and line judge guides and so on. I've saved a wide assortment of USTA PDF files over the years. But unless I take the time to re-name each one after downloading, I'll end up with a folder full of files with cryptic names that tell me nothing about the contents.

A few examples:

  • Rules of Tennis
    Filename: doc_13_16051.ashx.pdf
  • The Code: The Players' Guide for Unofficiated Matches
    Filename: doc_13_22409.pdf

  • High Performance Coaching Newsletter 8
    Filename: doc_437_391.pdf
  • Learn to Rally and Play Book
    Filename: 8EFA5FFCD0E3461CAEEFB19958E5208C.ashx.pdf
  • Top Ten Games Every Coach Should Know
    Filename: doc_13_12673.pdf
  • Chair Umpire Handbook
    Filename: doc_13_2319.pdf
  • General & Experienced Player Guidelines
    Filename: 9B46CE5C64B14C04B93686466D9C47AA.ashx.pdf
  • USTA Guide to tennis on college campuses
    Filename: doc_437_452.pdf

Is it too much to ask some organizations to make the effort to help users identify document content by the actual names of the files they post for public consumption?

How about about using 2010tennis_rules.pdf rather than doc_13_16051.ashx.pdf, or top10games.pdf rather than doc_13_12673.pdf?

I've made that common-sense suggestion in several USTA surveys, but so far apparently to no avail. I'm hoping 2010 might be the year this practice changes at USTA, and also with the journals that likewise frustrate David Appell--and likely others, too.

Topics:
Comments (1)   Permalink

Comments

michaelejahn
michaelejahn's picture
Offline
Registered: Apr 26 2006
20100510_comment_from_jahn

In my world, this is how I have named EVERYTHING internal to my world (AKA, Local Hard Drive- but, ONLY because i name the FOLDERS)

There is no universal naming convention. Many of us use automated workflows that react to naming conventions - so we named things EPSON7900_spGRACoL_2400ppi_175ls so when we drop it into the INPUT folder, it will RIP at 2400 pixels per inch and output to the EPSON 7900 with a simulation of 175 line screen via the Star Proof.

But, for everything external, I agree - Year, Month Date (bigger to smaller) then the subject is a great way to go.

Michael Jahn
Application Support Specialist
Compose Systems Inc, USA.
4740 Northgate Blvd. Suite 100
Sacramento, CA 95834
Tel: (916) 920-3838 ext 102
Fax: (916) 923-6776
Email: michaelejahn [at] composeusa [dot] com
Web: www.composeusa.com

Acrobat Job Board

Looking for a job or seeking to fill a job? Check out the new Acrobat job board.

Job Board >

Tech Talks

Go deeper into Acrobat through a new series of informal technical talks by Acrobat experts.

Tech Talks >

Membership

Sign up for your free membership today and save up to 40% on books, training, and more.

Join for free >